According to
Manetho, the VIth Dynasty kings came from Memphis. Appearances
of splendor were preserved under Dynasty VI rulers, who continued tradition of
building magnificent funerary complexes adorned inside with hieroglyphic texts.
But the first signs of social and political decay emerge. The right of
succession to the official positions acquired by provincial administrators
contributed vastly to the fall of central government. In last years of week and
doting pharaoh Pepi I and his heirs rule, anarchy reached its heyday.
|
(Horus Name) |
![]() |
Hr sHtp tA.wi |
|
(Nebti Name) |
|
sHtp nb.ti |
|
![]() ![]() |
Htp nb.ti |
||
(Golden Horus Name) |
|
![]() |
bik nbw smA ; bik nbw |
Abydos Table Saqqara Table (Nomen) |
|
tti |
|
(Nomen) |
![]() |
tti mr n ptH |
|
![]() |
sA ra tti |
||
![]() |
|
2306
- 2303 |
Weserkare
|
Abydos Table (Prenomen) |
|
wsr kA ra |
The fact that name of Userkare appears between rule of Teti and his son Pepi I may indicate that there was either co-regency in times of Pepi’s minority or Userkare overtook the rule illegally. First theory that has been spread by N. Grimal says that Userkare shared regent rule with Teti’s widow, the queen Iput in behalf of young successor to the throne. Second theory populated by W. Helck points at violent overtaking of rule. Manetho mentions murder of king Teti and this would corroborate the second theory, it does not exclude the first possibility, though. Also fact that in times of Pepi I name of Userkare’s vizier had been removed and the usurper’s cartouche was replaced. With king Teti cartouche would speak for the theory of usurper’s rule. In P. Munro opinion Userkare’s mother was queen Chentkaus. There is only few artifacts left including some seals of Userkare, however both his name and fact of holding rule are confirmed by Turin Canon and Table from Abydos |
(Horus Name) |
![]() |
Hr mry tAwy |
(Nebti Name) |
![]() |
nb.ti mri X.t |
(Golden Horus Name) |
![]() |
bik.w nbw(.w) |
(Prenomen) |
![]() |
nfr sA Hr |
Abydos Table (Prenomen) |
![]() |
mry ra |
Saqqara Table |
![]() |
ppy |
(Prenomen) |
![]() |
mry ra |
(Nomen) |
![]() |
sA ra ppy |
![]() |
sA Hw.t-Hr nb.ti iwn.t ppy |
|
![]() |
sA (i)tm nb iwnw Hw.t-Hr nb.t iwn.t ppy |
|
(Horus Name) |
![]() |
Hr anx xa.w |
(Nebti Name) |
![]() |
nb.ty anx xa.w |
(Golden Horus Name) |
![]() |
bik wy nbw(.wy) |
Abydos Table (Prenomen) |
![]() |
mr n ra |
Saqqara Table (Prenomen) |
![]() |
|
(Nomen) |
![]() |
nmty m sA=f |
|
(Horus Name) |
![]() |
Hr nTr xa.w |
(Nebti Name) |
![]() |
nb.ty nTr xa.w |
(Golden Horus Name) |
![]() |
sxm bik nbw |
Abydos Table Saqqara Table (Prenomen) |
![]() |
nfr kA ra |
(Nomen) |
![]() |
ppy |
![]() |
sA ra ppy nfr kA ra |
|
![]() |
sA ra ppy |
|
(Nomen) |
|
nmty m sA=f |
Abydos Table (Nomen & Prenomen) |
![]() |
mry.n ra DfA m sA.f |
|
Turin Canon |
|
nt-iqrty |
Queen known to us from later records in Turin Canon and Manetho. Unfortunately documentation in form of contemporary to her artifacts which could confirm her historical existence are missing. Legends passed by Manetho should be considered with care. Turin Canon assigns to her 2 years, 1 month and 1 day of rule while Manetho – 12 years and Erastotenes – 6 years. |
2183
-
2182 |
Neferka (the child)
|
Turin Canon |
|
nfr kA Neferka |
|
2182
-
2181 |
Nefer
|
Turin Canon |
|
nfr Nefer |
Turin Canon gives two years, one month and one day of rule. |
2181
-
2176 |
Ibi I
|
Turin Canon |
|
ibi
Ibi |
Turin Canon gives four years and two month of rule. |
2176-2175 |
[...] [...] |
On Turin Canon the name is unreadable but can to read time of rule - two years, one month and one day. |
Copyright © 2000-2013 Dariusz Sitek, Czestochowa - Chicago - Ann Arbor |